Founders agreements can be one of the most important tools for a new start up, or existing startup that is on the verge of receiving investment funds. A founders agreement helps establish the basic rights of founders with respect to early-stage, pre-seed, and seed stage companies. The point of the founders agreement as to capture the material deal points about how the business is to operate, and who will be doing what, before the up company receives significant outside funding, customers, revenue, or takes on risk.
If you are a founder looking to prepare a founders agreement, or are cofounder negotiating the terms of a founders agreement that has been presented to you, we have put together this comprehensive guide to help you through the process, go over the most common deal points, and you also find samples, checklists, and even an option for custom form if you need professional help.
One of the big questions that founders always ask themselves when doing searches and looking for more information about founders agreements is whether they really need one. In a review of what others have to say about the topic, it’s not difficult to see why founders come to this conclusion. Most of the literature on founders agreements online have to do with spelling out responsibilities, who will be doing what, will be in charge of decision-making, and what the goals of the startup will ultimately be. In our experience, these are actually none of the issues that cause the greatest amount of heartburn for new founders. However, the reality is that having candid discussions about difficult issues can be uncomfortable, and for that reason, many founders agreements focus on issues and content that is not ultimately that significant or consequential, and failed to address the real issues that can cause the greatest amount of controversy and headache for new founders. So, the purpose of this overview is not to regurgitate the other material that can be found online, but to provide a candid discussion of the issues that really must be covered in a founders agreement, if the founders are to protect themselves. Founders agreements are similar to prenuptial agreements – no matter how much the newlyweds discuss what their goals are, or who will be doing what responsibilities, these discussions miss the point because the real purpose of a prenuptial agreement is to protect each party, their rights, their assets, and their belongings, in the event the marriage ultimately does not work out. Founders agreements are the same way. They need to cover the most important issues, or else they will end up largely being worthless.
You probably already know from reading all the other articles on founders agreements about the topics that should be covered. These are as follows:
The above points are largely standard and largely noncontroversial. However, in our experience, there are an entirely different set of issues that constitute the majority of disputes between founders in the months and years after a startup emerges. They are as follows:
Voting Structure. Founders generally are unaware of the importance of setting up voting structure correctly. It tends to be assumed that each founders should have an equal vote in how the essence operates. However, changes to the voting structure can have a big impact on the business, and dramatically change how the start of operates, and whether it will be successful.
There are essentially 2 ways to set up voting structure: one person one vote, or one vote per share or unit held. Generally, it benefits the party that is contributing time or talent to have voting done one person one vote, and it generally benefits individuals contributing money to have one share or unit held. To give an example of the differences:
So, as seen from the example above, how the voting structure set up can make a big difference on how business actually gets done, and who has the authority to do what.
Division of Intellectual Property
Most startups and founders began working with each other without assigning their intellectual property to the venture. A lot of times this is simply because it is too time-consuming and expensive to start a new business entity, such as a C Corp. or LLC, during the startup’s development. Founders generally want to avoid getting trapped in a situation where they have spend the time and money into developing a business entity and then keep getting hit with taxes and franchise fees year after year, without actually having investment money to the project forward. So, founders generally begin on a project and a new startup without an actual corporate structure. This usually results in no assignment of inventions, discoveries, patents, intellectual property, trademarks, and other IP from the individual title and ownership of the founders conveyed to the business or startup.
So when founders began working with each other, they then continue to own all of their intellectual property individually, and not as an asset of the business. This can create major problems if there is collaboration between the parties on the development of the underlying IP to the business, as it becomes unclear who owns what. If the founders the later cannot get along, and each of them want to move ahead with the project separately, disputes and contention can arise over who has the right to do so, and who held the underlying intellectual property to the project being developed. The proper conveyance of IP rights in startup projects and developments, which occurs so frequently it is referred to as the “Zuckerberg problem,” can be avoided with the proper handling in a founders agreement.
Buy-outs When Founders Can’t Get Along
What happens when founders can’t get along with each other? In some cases, one founder no longer wants to work with the other founders, or one founders not pulling his or her weight, and the other founders feel it is unfair to continue on. One of the provisions that is missing in many founders agreements addresses what happens when the founders split, whether it is by ejecting one or more founders from the business, or whether the startup as a whole must dissolve because no one can get along.
In most incorporating documents, the provisions tend to be pretty unfavorable toward founders, usually set up so that the company can buy back the founders stock for basically nothing (i.e., par value), through what is called the company’s right of first refusal. This can lead to devastating consequences for a founder who was the principal engine behind the startup, and comes into a situation in which he/she is “outnumbered” by the other founders or others involved in the startup. Think of Steve Jobs in the 1980s – kicked out of his own company because he was outnumbered by the very people he trusted to help build Apple. This actually happens quite often. No founder wants to be ejected from the startup they created, but unless the founders agreement requires mandatory redemption at fair market value (including for intangibles such as sweat equity, unearned wages, etc.) then the original founder is basically out of luck. We have represented a number of originating founders that have gone through this situation, and it is universally a terrible experience and can leave the founder scarred, resentful, and angry. Again, more reasons to have a proper founders agreement that this is the real central issues, and not fluff.
Bad Investment Proposals
There is only one thing that is worse than not ever receiving any funding for a startup through Angel investors, investment groups, or others, which is receiving a proposal that is actually a horrible deal. The reality of many investment proposals is that they are largely unfavorable to the founders, they can leave the founders with little or no ownership or management, and in many cases, not offer very much money. But what happened the founders disagree on whether to take up a bad proposal? If 3 of the 4 founders simply want to get as much money as is possible, even though it the deal is a horrible deal, that requires them to basically close down the business, and one founder, who originated the startup concept to begin with, does not want to sell off the business and wants to keep developing it, it can result in a situation where due to the number of votes, the startup either dies in an undesirable exit, or the startup breaks up because the founders can’t get along and agree on what to do next. A properly prepared founders agreement will avoid these issues, and put into place specific provisions that will protect the founders from being pushed into bad investment proposals.
Check out of the top FAQs we get from startup clients with respect to founders agreements.
Should we do our founders agreement before or after we incorporate the startup? Generally, this is done before the start of the incorporation as a C Corp. or LLC, depending on what you pick, but there’s no reason why the founders agreement could not be tailored to address the points it needs to after formation. We would just adjust the provisions in the document focus on what it needs to, post formation.
Should we use a term sheet or an actual Founders Agreement? Is it okay to use a term sheet or deal memo instead of a Founders Agreement? We do both, and I think it is okay to do either. It depends on how comprehensive the founders agreement is going to be. Typically, when we do founders agreements, the founders agreement itself covers the legal obligations and covenants of each party, but the actual specifics of the new startup that’s going to be set up will be in the term sheet, such as who is going to be contributing wide, the voting structure, the capitalization of the startup, etc. The reason to include these things at this stage is so that you don’t fight about them later on. In business and startup matters, the passage of time can change a founder’s attitude and how they feel about what is best for them going forward. When a founders agreement is formed, usually nothing is happened yet, and that is often the best time to agree to the basic points about how the business is to be run.
Should our founders agreement including arbitration provision? It depends. Arbitration provisions are typically good for companies that are large, the don’t want to be bothered with lawsuits by lesser leveraged parties. Arbitration is typically favor the better leveraged party, and they typically disfavor the lesser leveraged party. The reason for this is because arbitrations are quite expensive, and are often much harder to win at than a typical lawsuit. So for example your typical fortune 500 company, in its goods and services agreements, will almost always have an arbitration provision, because the person on the other side is often an individual person with no real leverage, and not the kind of funds or resources necessary to take on a big company. So, in the startup context, and arbitration provision would favor an investor, and would probably be unfavorable to a startup founders with meeting talent or time/labor instead of money. You’ll have to decide whether you would rather have a dispute between the founders resolved privately, for a fee, or in the public context, such as the courts, for no fee. Arbitrations are a private version of the court system. The court system is funded by taxpayer money. Arbitrations are held by each party paying for them to happen.
We are being asked to identify who the “tax matters” partner is in our startup founding agreement. What is this mean and do we need to do this? Yes, this is actually normal. The IRS now requires new businesses, including new LLCs, to identify the point of contact with taxing authorities so that they have a point person to contact if there any questions about taxes. The tax matters partner is the person who is designated to do this. It would be normal to include this in a founders agreement. This will ultimately make its way into the initial resolutions of the C Corp., or the operating agreement of the LLC, depending on what type of entity is formed.
AXIS Legal Counsel’s Business and Corporations Practice provides legal advice to numerous businesses with a wide range of business matters. Axis represent small, medium-sized, and large business clients with a wide variety of business and corporate law matters. We represent early-stage companies as well as established businesses on a wide variety of business law matters, ranging from contracts and transactions, intellectual property, labor/employment law, business financing, mergers and acquisitions, real estate, insurance, business succession planning, and general advice and counsel. For information on retaining AXIS Legal Counsel to represent your business in connection with any legal matter, contact [email protected] or call (213) 403-0100 for a confidential consultation.
Check out our complete line of handy forms and templates for California small businesses.
*** NOW UPDATED FOR 2022 ***
Have a question that is not answered? Submit your question below so we can help other businesses by contributing to the knowledge base.
Oops! We could not locate your form.
We have an extensive FAQ Library that covers the most common questions we get from businesses, as well as FAQs on recent changes in law affecting businesses.
We have represented a variety of business clients in numerous industries across multiple disciplines and practice matters. Here are some of the highlights.
Thank you for your excellent counsel. We feel so lucky to have met you and intend to have a long and prosperous relationship with you and Axis Legal.
So grateful I found Axis this year and want to thank you again for your amazing representation this year when I was closing my development deal for my series.
Thank you again for everything!! You are a reminder that there still are great people in this world :)
I am a serial entrepreneur in Los Angeles and have hired over 20 law firms for my diversified companies within the last decade. Ms. Soofi has provided better council than any full service international law firm I have retained. She provides aggressive professional services and makes me feel comfortable throughout the legal process. She has a diversified skill set encompassing (but not limited to) litigation, IP, entertainment, corporate compliance, HR, Private equity and venture capital. Ms. Soofi has high ethical standards and makes paying for legal services transparent and frictionless. I feel very fortune to have met her and I look forward to a long term professional relationship. I can't speak highly enough of her and I recommend her to anyone with high standards.
Thank you again for everything you've done for my family and me! You are a blessing in our lives. I wish you all the best.
Rabeh – you are the best. These revisions are just right and I appreciate your responses to my questions below – I feel a lot more comfortable sending this across. Our many thanks to you for all your counsel.
Thank you very much for helping with this contract. Your analysis and explanation made it much easier for me to feel comfortable with the contract. I will certainly not hesitate to call on your services should I so need them, or to recommend them to others in need. Once again, thank you.
Thank you for your time, understanding and diligence in this matter Rabeh, as well as explaining things to me in detail along the way. I truly appreciate it, and will contact you whenever we need revisions or legal help in the future.
Thank you for helping me with all my past legal challenges. You are the best (and smartest) attorney I’ve ever met! Im so grateful for you ;-)
Rabeh, I must say that we’ve been very impressed with your work and so very grateful for this outcome. We value your professionalism and have been delighted by your attitude and your masterful efforts on our behalf!
Ms. Soofi, I appreciate you from the bottom of my heart and soul and thank you very much for your patience and your wonderful service, through these months with us. I mostly thank you very much for your caring personality!
Rabeh, I cannot thank you enough for the extremely thorough and thoughtful insights you’ve provided. I am so glad we sought out your counsel in this matter.
Rabeh, you are an amazing attorney. Thanks so much for representing me.
Gave up hope there for a second on it - Thank you Rabeh for really fighting for me!
Rabeh, thank you again for your brilliant review and comprehension of this incredibly complicated matter. Thank you also for explaining it clearly to me. I will take all these items you've mentioned into consideration. Thank you so much. I can't thank you enough.
Ms.Soofi Is a great Attorney. She has been instrumental in helping my family solve our legal troubles. Her knowledge and expertise provided a swift resolution to our inquiry. I would highly recommend Ms. Soofi because she is fair-minded and cares about her clients.
I found Rabeh to have a knowledgeable understanding of the laws as she was able to clearly explain to me how best to proceed and what the options were. Rabeh is one of the few lawyers I have worked in the past that really listens and you feel has your best interests in mind. She clearly has compassion for clients, and is honest in a way that I have never had prior lawyers be with me. I was happy with the outcome and recommend her highly.
Fantastic lawyer. I hired her to help with a legal matter involving an entertainment dispute with an independent label. It was ugly and emotional because it became clear we were totally taken advantage of by the other side. Rabeh is great at what she does and beyond that, a decent person with a lot of compassion. I wish there was a way to give 10 stars.
Rabeh was there for me every step of the way. She made everything simple and as stress free as she could, and transferring to her was far easier than i imagined. My case was a challenge, but it had depth and meaning and Rabeh recognized this early on. She is not just an attorney who comes in to argue the technical legalities, she is a true advocate.
am so happy we found Attorney Soofi. She is maybe the most honest and hardworking person I ever hired. She was kind and has a huge heart and I feel like we have a protector for life. I never had anyone stick up for me and my rights as much as she did.
Rabeh is hands down, an amazing lawyer. She was hired to help us with an entertainment business company, and I have to say - I have never met a more honest, trustworthy, and knowledgeable lawyer.
Rabeh is one of the few lawyers I have worked in the past that really listens and you feel has your best interests in mind. She clearly has compassion for clients, and is honest in a way that I have never had prior lawyers be with me. I was happy with the outcome and recommend her highly.
Wonderful lawyer. Honest and actually cares about the people she represents above all else. Very please and happy I found her!
Rabeh is really excellent at knowing the law and explaining it in a very easy to understand manner. I have no experience with the legal industry, and I am very thankful that i found her because I have heard there are a lot of bad lawyers out there who can really take advantage of you.
Rabeh is without a doubt the best lawyer I have ever hired. She is extremely smart, aggressive, and compassionate. So relieved and happy we found her.
Rabeh is a godsend. She is aggressive and fights for clients. She helped me with my case and took care of me from A to Z. Cannot recommend highly enough.
I have had the great pleasure and privilege of using the services of this amazing attorney. The entertainment business is a layered and nuanced industry and I cannot think of a better person to maneuver in this complex field.
This is sample text for Vertical marquee plugin.
This is sample text for Vertical marquee plugin.
Nothing in this site is intended to constitute legal advice, nor create any attorney-client relationship. Nothing on this site is intended to predict success, make any representations about your rights or legal options, nor guarantee any outcome. No attorney-client relationship exists unless agreed to in writing. The stock photos, graphics, or images on our blog or in other parts of this website may or does depict individuals who are third parties or models and not actual clients or lawyers of this law office. ATTORNEY ADVERTISING MATERIAL
By using this site, you agree to our Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy. We may modify our Terms and Conditions and/or Privacy Policy at any time without notice.
AXIS LEGAL COUNSEL P.C.
LOS ANGELES
1001 Wilshire Blvd. #2181
Los Angeles CA 90017
(213) 403-0100
[email protected]
Copyright 2011-2024. Axis Legal Counsel Professional Corporation. All rights reserved.